PC-MAN纪念版而已，我如是想。但是10余秒之后，PC-MAN熟悉的音乐响起，LOGO处的彩色小怪物被激活，不由自主地我便尝试按下方向区的按键，彪悍、牛X、老吕等一系列同义词迸发出脑海，惊艳了，为谷歌今天的可操作Logo。

       仔细观察在“Google搜索”的按钮边上还冒出了“Insert Coin”的按钮，按下后LOGO游戏区调节至双打模式-上下左右为主控；WASD为副控。

       于是兴致勃勃地重温起PCMAN这个经典游戏，以至于忘却它的载体。冲过一关后，居然还能继续玩下去……有资料显示Google此次的A playable logo包含了PC-Man的完整版255关卡，并附带传说中第256个场景的kill screen，当然要看到这个界面是需要付出绝对的代价的，或许可以Google一下打爆PC-Man攻略，嘿嘿。

       本次的可交互doodle，毫无疑问地又是Google的首创之作，由资深交互设计师Marcin Wichary提出，Ryan Germick完成了最终设计。在Joystiq上Randy Nelson以这样一句话结束了文章《Google celebrates Pac-Man's 30th anniversary with playable logo》——

       So, for today at least, you can tell your boss: "I may be browsing the web and playing a game, but I'm also being part of something historic."

仅以游戏闯关图片纪念这一历史时刻——

单人闯关模式 – 第一关卡：

双人闯关模式 – 第一关卡（角色2长期处于瘫痪状态- -|||）：

闯关成功的Google地图闪屏：

继续，双人闯关模式 – 第二关卡：

闯关成功的Google地图闪屏，角色2依旧不明真相中……：

最喜欢看到的画面，我逃，我逃，我逃逃逃！！！

我追！我追！我追追追！！！

双人闯关模式 – 第三关卡，已经有了横竖横的感觉：

果然，被消灭了，55555~

6/18/07—-Great software design, whether we know it or not, is on everyone’s mind
thanks to the iPod and the successes of Web 2.0. Now, more than ever, it's clear that
design sells. And sells and sells and leads to giddy IPOs. Now of course both the iPod
and many Web 2.0 companies have other perceived value. The iPod really did put
1000 songs in your pocket. And sites enabled by Web 2.0 technologies do enable Web
2.0 behaviors ranging from keeping track of friends (or "presence"), generating digital
content and sharing it, communicating with strangers about topics of common interest,
and other participatory networking. But these sites' respective designs and the user experience they offer, that’s what created the wave of usage and participation. Not
just what the users could do but how they could do it.
So the question for those of us in the industry is, is this easy? Is it impossible? Can we
also create products which offer a user experience so compelling as to dominate a marketplace or two? In particular, do we all have to be Steve Jobs?
If so, might as well move on. Jobs is either a genius at coming up with technically
innovative products that we all covet or he is wildly lucky. It doesn’t really matter for the
sake of this discussion, since there is nothing any of us can do to become more of a
genius or luckier than we already are. I suppose you can try various nutritional supplements, or participate in various mysterious rites, but that’s a little further afield than I plan to take us here.
A better question is, do you have to be Google to create a Google Maps? No. I don’t think so. Because Web 2.0 is different than Steve Jobs. Web 2.0 gives us hope. Hope that we too will become millionaires. Web 2.0 technologies have enabled business models and URLs that have driven a lot of dollars into people’s pockets and should, with some help from the humans, continue to do so.
But we’ve got to answer three key questions and answer them honestly. First, will Web 2.0 technologies provide the rest of us with the magic answer? Second, if not, what prevents the rest of us from creating Google Maps or applications of its ilk? And third, are there
other technologies out there on the horizon with even more to offer?
First things first however. What is Web 2.0? Like other things, I know it when I see it. But that’s a lazy way out. The term Web 2.0 as originally defined in detail by Tim O’Reilly involved:
1. The Web as Platform    互联网作为平台
2. Harnessing Collective Intelligence  利用集体智慧
3. Data is the Next Intel Inside  数据是下一个英特尔内部(内芯)
4. End of the Software Release Cycle  年底的软件发布周期
5. Lightweight Programming Models  轻量级编程模式
6. Software Above the Level of a Single Device  软件以上级别的单一装置
7. Rich User Experiences  丰富的用户体验

这是一篇受密码保护的文章。您需要提供访问密码：

密码：